If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. http://monthrod95.jigsy.com/entries/general/How-long-Away-Can-One-Be-From-some-sort-of-5G-Mobile-System-Before-Becoming-Hazardous look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone. These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause problems for people. The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health. The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue. Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could result in many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer. Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower. Although this may sound like something that's good however, those living close to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas. This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues. This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. https://zenwriting.net/toothbike05/what-lengths-away-can-1-be-from-some-sort-of-5g-mobile-system-before-becoming includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue). The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. what is a safe distance from a cell tower are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards. Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.
http://monthrod95.jigsy.com/entries/general/How-long-Away-Can-One-Be-From-some-sort-of-5G-Mobile-System-Before-Becoming-Hazardous|https://zenwriting.net/toothbike05/what-lengths-away-can-1-be-from-some-sort-of-5g-mobile-system-before-becoming|what is a safe distance from a cell tower
